Translation missing: en.posts.shared.post_not_found

Powered by
WIND


Recent Posts

Recent Comments

  • Yes, solo racing has always teetered on the edge of legality, especially before efficient onboard power generation, AIS, and marpa-tracking radar. Since Rule 5 requires "continuous, proper lookout by *all* means available," then you are clearly not complying with Rule 5 if you're sleeping, if you are down below eating, making repairs, etc. and there are places - like crossing shipping lanes or other high traffic areas where you really need to comply with the letter as well as the spirit of the rule.

    AIS and Radar give some ability to monitor when eyes aren't "outside the boat," but many commercial fishing vessels don't use AIS and other types of vessels (including other sailboats - perhaps even the one you're racing on) provide poor radar returns. 

    I think the reasonable compromise is that violation of Rule 5 only becomes an issue if a collision or near-miss occurs, and you can't prove you were maintaining watch under the requirements of Rule 5. Bear in mind that outside of land there's not really an enforcement mechanism - it's not like the IRPCS police show up off the continental shelf and charge you with sleeping. In the event of a collision, however, you can be sure the responsibility would be assigned accordingly.
    Today 15:29
  • Craig .. here's the pic for discussion.

    image.png 122 KB


    I've been that starbaord boat .. not on the line but in the middle of the course with no other boats around.  Port was an experienced racer that I knew, we made eye contact and saw each other for 10 BL's. 

    By the time I realized he wasn't doing a last sec duck (main sheet got jammed) .. there was nothing I could do.  I think the rule and Case 87 are fine.

    The starboard skipper would have to possess the presence of mind to actually turn toward the port boat .. if to have any chance at making more space for port.   In the heat of that split moment ... that's a pretty tall ask IMO.  Turning away from the danger (arguably the natural instinct) .. only works to decrease port's space to avoid. 
    Tue 11:12
  • $TulipBuck$
    26-Mar-17 16:38
  • Clark ... there are many other examples one can come up with when stepping through the Codes especially, where an OA/RC misinterprets/applies a Code against a person on a competitor-basis. 

    Ang
    26-Mar-17 10:43
  • I have the attached two documents from 2017 when Virtual Marks were being introduced.

    The guidance document, 2.4 says:

    (a) A waypoint is not a physical object, and

    (d) RRS 18 and RRS 28.2 cannot apply unchanged because a mark is defined as an object.

    Does anyone have any insights about the apparent philosophical change?

    AppendixWPRulesforRacingAroundWaypoints-[19996].pdf 25.4 KB
    GuidanceonRacingAroundWaypoints-[19997].pdf 373 KB
    26-Mar-15 22:09

Forums Leader Board

This Month

1 Satish Kumar Kanwar 4.2K
2 John Allan 3.2K
3 Richard Jones 2K
4 Joan Noguera 2K
5 Andrew Lesslie 1.6K
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more