Forums
The Racing Rules of Sailing |
1874 Posts
|
|
Rule 18 and Room at the Mark |
176 Posts
|
|
Protest Committee & Hearing Procedures |
110 Posts
|
|
Race Committee & Race Management |
84 Posts
|
|
Rules 2 and 69 |
49 Posts
|
|
Match and Team Racing Rules |
47 Posts
|
|
Training Materials, Presentations and Classes |
60 Posts
|
|
Share Your SI/NOR Language |
49 Posts
|
|
Event Management & Forum System (Q's, Comments & Suggestions) |
178 Posts
|
|
Regole e dintorni - Italian Channel |
50 Posts
|
Note: This forum is not affiliated with World Sailing and comments on this forum do not represent an official interpretation of the rules, definitions, cases or regulations. The only official interpretations are those of World Sailing.
Recent Posts
-
13 CommentsJohn Anderson, Yesterday 16:14
-
0 CommentsJohn Anderson, Tue 22:27
-
13 CommentsJohn Anderson, Tue 18:35
-
46 CommentsPAngelo Guarino, Tue 10:44
-
7 CommentsAlan Chidsey, Fri 03:29
Recent Comments
-
Looks like several scoring systems allow for it. You will find the instructions for how to do it on RacingRulesOfSailing.org here.Paul Zupan Today 04:48
-
John Anderson Yesterday 23:55
-
Thanks John,
In the simulation discards are a phase shift, we normally have 20-25% discards and provide DUT averages for boats away representing the club at major regattas. I agree its is a balance and our approach is to be explicit as possible in setting rules which are always and compromise. Thanks again for the feedback. Cheers, Have Fun!John Anderson Yesterday 23:31 -
Yup, Case 67 settles this explicitly in a W/L collision causing damage to a non-racing boat, it does not explicitly deal with the amount of damage caused being a conflict since in this case the rule 69 implications removes that discission. I can't find a case where monetary damages were seen as a conflict of interest in the way it's implied in this discussion. But the definitions are poor for several things including "damage" vs "major damage", and major damage isn't even a requirement, only that it may have caused major damage. so there is always room for interpretation.Craig Priniski Yesterday 15:57
-
Wassup Niko! I heard you might be doing the Lipton with Cole. Epic line up of competition. See you there. At least two of the jury are IJs that read these threads so ......I agree with everything.
Guess that means you chose Liptons over champion of champions. It will be really great to see you.Justin Scott Yesterday 02:55