Skip to main content

The Racing Rules of Sailing

No Flag No Foul

Subscribe
P
John Allan
Nationality: Australia
Certifications:
  • National Race Officer
  • National Judge
In another post I said I would quite like to see the construct of RRS 44 changed so that time for a boat to take an on-water penalty ran from the hail of 'protest'."

Tentatively, the change would be to replace 'the incident' in RRS 44.2 and 44.3 with 'the hail of "protest" and, if required, the display of a red flag'

What I had in mind (with some trepidation) was moving towards a 'No Flag No Foul' approach.

If there is no hail of 'protest' and if required display of red flag at the first reasonable opportunity, I am proposing that the there should be no obligation on a boat to take a RRS 44 penalty.

If there is no  If there is no hail of 'protest' and if required display of red flag at the first reasonable opportunity there can be no valid protest and no hearing.

I think it is fair and just to say that a boat should not be required to voluntarily take a penalty when there is no power to give an involuntary penalty.

Maybe an interpretation of 'promptly take an appropriate penalty' would be needed as follows:

A boat may promptly take an appropriate penalty by:
  1. taking a penalty in accordance with RRS 44;
  2. taking a post-race penalty in accordance with RRS T1;  or
  3. accepting, subject to any request for re-opening or Appeal, the decision of a protest committee penalising her.
Created: Today 00:12

Comments

Format:
P
Angelo Guarino
Forum Moderator
Nationality: United States
Certifications:
  • Regional Judge
John .. all this is adjustable by NOR/SI.  Maybe a first step is to formulate NOR/SI language and try to convince some "Beer Cans" to adopt them and see how it goes.  

I predict 'Mad Max Thunderdome' in very short order. 
Created: Today 00:17
You must be signed in to add a comment.
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more