• Is There a Case in the Future for A Less-Formal Meditation Process
  6 Comments
  John Quirk Yesterday 14:00
• Happy Holidays!
  1 Comment
  Paul Zupan Tue 19:56
• Can a boat break RRS 2 while breaking RRS 23.1?
  24 Comments
  Angelo Guarino Tue 11:40
• 2 questions on 18.3.
  11 Comments
  Nick Taylor Mon 16:41
• Class breaks in handicap racing
  23 Comments
  Jonah Zimmerman Fri 06:18

• Is There a Case in the Future for A Less-Formal Meditation Process
  All comments so far: thanks for the great comments so far, and once other comments perhaps come in,  I will provide a more indepth and balanced reply as best I can in due course (ie merits or otherwise of a new RRS 'Appendix U'). Obviously there are significant 'pros and cons' with a  [classic] Mediation format (as there are with both Arbitration (our 'Appendix T' - no witnesses permitted) and litigating through the Courts - in our case 'the full Hearing' process). I only have indepth experience in all three forms strictly related to my own profession (execution of major international engineeried-construction projects). Yes, RYA (I am a Member also) does have an 'Advisory Meeting' format but this is quite a bit different from Mediation (well, as it is generally practised in various industry sectors and applications anyway). 
  
  
  John Quirk Today 02:08
• Can a boat break RRS 2 while breaking RRS 23.1?
  John,
  
  I don't think it's so much a case of 'overthinking' vs 'misthinking' OP's question.
  
  Ang's question wasn't really so much about whether a breach was an action of fairness to the competition or not.  His question was more investigating the use of the word 'compete' in Rule 2 and throughout the RRS.
  
  If I may share some history to the question - - some time ago, I mused with Ang, whether a boat who had finished was allowed to motor clear of the line - relevant to the word 'compete'.  I mused that the boat was not 'competing' once finished -- - no boat on boat or tactical striving could be done to better their score once they had crossed the line.  People struggled with applying the 'striving' meaning to RRS 42.1, so I dropped it.
  
  At which point, Ang mused a similar question of whether the word 'compete' in rule 2 was similarly applied.  We all agree (I hope) that some actions can affect fairness at any time, off or on the water.  We must also agree that propulsion doesn't help off the water.  So that word 'compete' may be being used interchangeably.  At least this is the interesting issue to me.
  
  
  Benjamin Harding Today 01:31
• Class breaks in handicap racing
  definitely agree, although ORC seems to have issues with full-keel boats for some reason.
  Niko Kotsatos Yesterday 14:32
• Happy Holidays!
  Same to everyone too, from the Philippines...

  

  John Quirk Yesterday 04:08
• 2 questions on 18.3.
  Are we assuming 15 and 16.1 do not apply?
  Philip Hubbell Tue 19:03

Forums Leader Board

This Month