Skip to main content

Forums

Note: This forum is not affiliated with World Sailing and comments on this forum do not represent an official interpretation of the rules, definitions, cases or regulations. The only official interpretations are those of World Sailing.

Powered by WIND


Recent Posts

Recent Comments

  • Plenty of room for logic chopping here! But doesn't reasonable apprehension only come into it if the apprehensive actually takes action as a result of the apprehension? If I have reasonable apprehension that port will not succeed in crossing, and duck or slow, then port is penalised. But if I have that apprehension, but hold my course, and in the event port crosses by a reasonable margin, i don't think port gets a penalty. There are shades of meaning here. "As a result of my apprehension I felt compelled to take avoiding action" is not as strong as "with collision imminent I was compelled to take action ..." and does require have a sense of external influence as in "with collision imminent I was required by RRS14 to take action ..." ?
    Today 13:23
  • Yes I know that I was stretching it I’m a J24 with 4 crew facing out.  But in a sitting out dinghy?  Helm and crew can’t have eyes in the back of their head
    Today 07:48
  • Ang I as well .. was just trying to clearly describe where/how the ambiguity resides that you pointed out. 

    And I appreciate it.

    (Why do I suddenly feel like I'm Charlie Brown and you're Lucy holding the ball! <g>). 

    I never called you a blockhead.
    Yesterday 19:26
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more