Translation missing: en.posts.shared.post_not_found

Powered by
WIND


Recent Posts

Recent Comments

  •  We're judges.  We take whatever guidance is available for what it's worth, and the World Sailing Judges Manual is worth quite a lot.

    See Calum's post.

    I'm not suggesting protesting a dead sailor, and I wouldn't expect an OA to want to do anything for other than an egregious breach.

    But if the headline runs 'Coastguard commander criticizes sailing club for not ensuring life jackets are worn' that's bringing the sport into disrepute. 
    Today 23:38
  • Thank you for your comments!
    This was a real case we had in Argentina at ILCA 6.
    Boat B went back to the club and didn't request redress, and the RO didn't take any action either.
    Boat A RET.

    Cheers !!!!!
    Today 22:01
  • Here's one approach

    No Sign Off, No Sausage.
    No Sign off No Sausage.jpg 3.23 MB
    Today 20:53
  • il link non funziona
    Today 17:02
  • Dustin ... thanks for that input. The standard language out of Vakaros overly-broadly denies R4R IMO (as the "no fault of their own" clause should take care of the vast majority of a boat's individual equipment issues). That's why in my OP I framed the question based on the assumption that R4R-restrictive language was not present. 

    Seems the consensus thus far is that errors/omission from systems, that perform an "RC function" and are implemented by the RC, map onto "improper action/omission of the [race] committee .." in RRS 61.4(a)(1) without further clarification needed in the race-docs. 

    That said, I think my suggestion of adding "system" to the term "Race Committee" would hurt anything. 
    Thu 13:51

Forums Leader Board

This Month

1 John Allan 6.4K
2 Catalan Benaros 3K
3 Justin Scott 1.65K
4 Benjamin Harding 1.6K
5 Stephen Jones 1.6K
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more