Translation missing: en.posts.shared.post_not_found

Powered by
WIND


Recent Posts

Recent Comments

  • Today 13:16
  • Justin re: "@Angelo I'm intrigued by your strong opposition."

    I, and the judges I serve with, do not receive any compensation from US Sailing.  Therefore, a non-US Sailing member boat before my panel is not getting any more of a "free ride" than another.   

    Also, there is no requirement that a PC have any USS Certified Judges on the panel.  Certified and uncertified judges alike ... we volunteer to the OA typically ... not US Sailing (unless USS is the OA). 

    Also, I don't want to be bothered managing who's  paid-up or not .. and managing funds.  What a royal PITA that would be. 
    Yesterday 12:07
  • John P ... it actually would not even take a full, new, word-efficient sentence.  Maybe a small edit like below would make the USS-JC's view clear....

    Top of page 75 ...

    If the arbitrator believes that one or more boats broke a rule [(and were not exonerated)], he or she should say which boats may have broken those rules (again, without stating why) [without identifying the rules by name/number or the arbitrator's reasoning,] and then list the options available to each party, including:
    • Taking a Post-Race Penalty,
    • Retiring, or
    • Not taking a Penalty
    Wed 17:53
  • Swiss Sailing: https://www.swiss-sailing.ch/regattieren/teilnehmende-an-einer-regatta

    Tue 09:28
  • Thank you for the applicable section from the Etchells class rules. It was only an example to illustrate the kind of body position. The actual class I race is not the Etchells.
    Tue 07:33

Forums Leader Board

This Month

1 John Allan 2.6K
2 Stephen Jones 1.6K
3 Justin Scott 1.05K
4 David Taylor 600
5 Al Sargent 450
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more