Translation missing: en.posts.shared.post_not_found

Powered by
WIND


Recent Posts

Recent Comments

  • I agree with this very, very strongly indeed.

    In fact, I'd go further and argue that what we're dealing with is a Gresham's Law of conduct; that is, the bad conduct drives out the good. There is no incentive to follow the RRS and take your penalty when you know you're wrong when the alternative of a lot of shouting rules and brazening it out gets rewarded. 

    A self-policing sport does not work if the culture is that any protest gets met with moaning about "Sort it out on the water". We have, then, a problem. How it gets fixed, I do not know for sure, but that the issue needs to be faced is I think a given.
    Today 12:55
  • But Angelo, we already know what happens if you don't require a flag from several years of dinghy racing. Why would one need a further experiment? 
    Today 01:35
  • Sorry.

    I was in a rush last night so missed attaching the link. 

    (Stumbled on that appeal case looking for something completely different!  Will take some time to digest it.)

    I think I'm with Mike, though now I wonder what the repercussions of withdrawing it would be. Might cause even more issues! 

    Of course the issue of conflict of interest is not addressed in the RYA Appeal. That's another matter.
     
    Haha. It's never-ending. 

    Interesting find though... 


    Today 00:14
  • Yesterday 19:03
  • I think that there is a difference between 'will promptly take a penalty' and 'are encouraged to'. 

    When reading RRS 2 it is essential to refer to WS Case 138, which sets out actions that can be cosidered to be examples of bad sportsmanship or misconduct.
    Wed 12:51

Forums Leader Board

This Month

1 Michael Moradzadeh 3.6K
2 John Allan 3.45K
3 Benjamin Harding 2.5K
4 Jim Champ 2.35K
5 Michael Butterfield 2.25K
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more