So, a protest has been presented for an infraction of part 2, in a race later on abandoned, or during a starting procedure, ended with a general recall.
PC verify there no infraction of RRS 2, no damages or injuries, and ground for a redress to any of the boat.
That's the only fact found. So PC make parts and witness free, and close the hearing, as no boat can be penalized for RRS 36.
PC go throught the full hearing, parts and testimonies; writes facts found, rule broken of part 2, an as decision: no DSQ - race abandoned - as per RRS 36 (provided no damages or injuries etc etc)
Definitvely Procedure B is ok, but, procedure A, is it formally wrong not to define which boat actually broke a part 2 rule, though no penalization is foreseen?