Translation missing: en.posts.shared.post_not_found

Powered by
WIND


Recent Posts

Recent Comments

  • Gordon, that is terrific, and could I ask you for an email contact for the person actively involved in that program?. I ask this, as here in the Philippines (working with (PSA, PGYC and PCG), I sponsor an aligned but modest grass roots program - 'Boat Handling & Piloting', taking racing sailors and uniformly teaching them advanced skills (modular courses), leading to national qualifications ('MARINA' - Captain 1&2 certifcations) and also woring with the Philippines Coast Guard (PCG / PCGA) as volunteers for search & rescue etc activities, as well as operating committee boats etc for both dinghy & 'big boat' regattas. We have several such certifed young sailors in our kell-boat youth racing team (current national champions) and are better more competent racing sailors for it.
    Today 00:55
  • I've also used this mid-line "guide" buoy. On the one hand it works. On the other hand, the less experienced sailors basically get penalized for using the guide, and it backfired the last race after all the coaches finally told their kids: "if you're not out past that buoy, then you're late!"
    Yesterday 15:35
  • Thanks  Bob and an acute or sharp pencil scenario at that, and I would be inclined to agree with you. As such, to my original point, the leaning on this scenrio would be that we do in fact have a third standard of proof for a PC to consider (for 18.2 (e) and APPENDIX F).
     .
    Yesterday 09:54
  • What a great Christmas Bonbon you gave us Mark! It's a Cracker!

    There have been many incredibly insightful comments but no agreed conclusion.

    Personally I like Jim's recent summary of "Angelo's interpretation" as it appears to be the fairest interpretation.

    To me, the underlying problem appears to be that the rules themselves are not 'deterministic' in this and some other situations. Ultimately, the rules alone should be sufficient. Cases may help but they should not be required.

    Yesterday 01:11
  • At my Club we have solved this issue two ways.  Most of our distance random-leg races finish in front of the Clubhouse, between two pilings lined up with our "Finish Hut" on shore.

    For our weeknight series where we run five starts for eight Divisions in the 1830-1900 timeframe, we state that a boat in a starting class that finishes by 2100 makes the race valid for that starting class, and that boats finishing after 2100 shall take their own finish time and report it to the RC.  If no boat in a starting class finishes by 2100 then the race is abandoned for that class.  This allows our RC volunteers to know when their job is completed, without penalizing slow boats.

    Similarly for our regatta distance races, typically 20-25 nm, we state that there is no time limit, but the RC will stay on station (ashore) for five hours from the starting time.  Boats finishing later may take their own times and report it to the RC.   We implemented this about three years ago and have had no issues.
    Wed 14:57

Forums Leader Board

This Month

1 John Quirk 13K
2 Benjamin Harding 5.25K
3 Jim Champ 4.25K
4 Michael Butterfield 3.4K
5 Tim OConnell 3.4K
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more