• Appendix T - Arbitration
  6 Comments
  Bob Scott Today 20:27
• Navigating the WS Website
  0 Comments
  John Allan Today 02:59
• Prescriptions of other MNA's?
  7 Comments
  Angelo Guarino Yesterday 13:44
• 49.2 on boats with no lifelines
  11 Comments
  Stephen Jones Sun 16:32
• 2025-2028 US Sailing Prescriptions Updated
  13 Comments
  Angelo Guarino Sun 01:07

• Appendix T - Arbitration
  There can be no appeal from an arbitration. Generally a voulantary penalty is taken, and the protest withdrawn, so there is no decision to appeal.
  
  You may always refuse the arbitrators decision and ask for a hearing. 
  
  Indeed you can accept a post race penalty, and still ask for a hearing 
  Michael Butterfield Today 20:57
• 2025-2028 US Sailing Prescriptions Updated
  I think the CA should be more proactive than that.
  
  CA should check each entry for CA Membership, give entrants a chance to pay up, and reject any entries that don't comply.
  John Allan Today 12:05
• Prescriptions of other MNA's?
  Swiss Sailing: https://www.swiss-sailing.ch/regattieren/teilnehmende-an-einer-regatta
  
  
  Peter Meyer Today 09:28
• 49.2 on boats with no lifelines
  Thank you for the applicable section from the Etchells class rules. It was only an example to illustrate the kind of body position. The actual class I race is not the Etchells.
  Stephen Jones Today 07:33
• Mark-Room and Room to Pass an Obstruction who wins.
  Rule 10 (port vs starboard) may seem like the result of a 'flip of the coin' but in reality it comes from the COLREGs on which the RRS are based.
  
  Maybe someone flipped a coin a long-long-long time ago, but the RRS simply allow us to race much more closely than the COLREGs would otherwise allow.
  
  That said, Rule 11 (windward boat keep clear) is similarly arbitrary but also based on the COLREGs.
  David Taylor Yesterday 23:43

Forums Leader Board

This Month