Forums
The Racing Rules of Sailing |
1842 Posts
|
|
Rule 18 and Room at the Mark |
176 Posts
|
|
Protest Committee & Hearing Procedures |
110 Posts
|
|
Race Committee & Race Management |
81 Posts
|
|
Rules 2 and 69 |
49 Posts
|
|
Match and Team Racing Rules |
47 Posts
|
|
Training Materials, Presentations and Classes |
59 Posts
|
|
Share Your SI/NOR Language |
49 Posts
|
|
Event Management & Forum System (Q's, Comments & Suggestions) |
174 Posts
|
|
Regole e dintorni - Italian Channel |
50 Posts
|
Note: This forum is not affiliated with World Sailing and comments on this forum do not represent an official interpretation of the rules, definitions, cases or regulations. The only official interpretations are those of World Sailing.
Recent Posts
-
7 CommentsAntónio Negreiros Fernandes, Yesterday 22:21
-
80 CommentsChin In, Sun 11:31
-
30 CommentsPJohn Allan, Sun 09:56
-
11 CommentsDave Sanderson, Fri 11:45
-
51 CommentsPJohn Allan, Fri 00:12
Recent Comments
-
I am shocked at the number of "Windward Apologists" there are in this thread!
I have been slapped down here for challenging much sketchier scenarios than this.
W knowingly took a risk and it did not pay off. This is an open and shut case. Rule 11; W is DSQ.
Maaaaybe if L altered course, but the OP facts found were that she did not.Kett Cummins Today 02:53 -
Antonio re: "any other proof"
My question is "Proof for what?" That single person is the RC. RRS 29.1 says ".. the RC shall ...".
It's not an issue of proof. It's an issue of obligation.
There is nothing in the rules that require anything more than RRS 29.1, A5 and A10 for OCS. All other things an RC might record for their own records is up to them.
Other than that, I'm not sure what you are asking.Angelo Guarino Today 02:06 -
Jim Champ Reply to: 22039 - John Quirk: furthermore, in CASE 50, in the first sentence, it actually uses the term "genuine and reasonable apprehension" (this of course a standard used by courts with applications for an arrest in connection with non-bailable offences), and in the second sentence 'reasonable doubt' (again, a well-tested legal / court term). Quite some complexity for a competitor and PC to become acquainted with :).
John Quirk Yesterday 02:01 -
Ang I as well .. was just trying to clearly describe where/how the ambiguity resides that you pointed out.
And I appreciate it.(Why do I suddenly feel like I'm Charlie Brown and you're Lucy holding the ball! <g>).
I never called you a blockhead.John Allan Mon 19:26
