I'm with Phillip, in the definition its a measure, and that measure should be consistent. A less than competent crew is not entitled to more room than an expert one, and would be breaking a rule if they require it (lets leave room made freely available out of it for now).  Similarlty an expert crew is allowed the same room as a competent one, even though they may not need it,

John, I agree with you about reasonable apprehension and skill level, but I think its a red herring in the context of Room and Case 103.

A holywood is really a match racing term for a great show, but may not be genuine.

@Lars - having done a number of WASZP events, I found the RRS 42 rules easy to see and enforce.

The world sailing judges manual changes on improper act or ommission in each version, each seeming giving judges more room for interpretation. Just track the change next time, it may be what gordon and i may expect.
The old bad race management hidden behind the word may not shall,, may not be tolerated.
A time of change perhaps! I believe for the better if we are to improve standards and improve the sport.

To me once a boat had done a 44.2 set of turns, they have not initially finished and there can be no other score but the last finish.

Other rule breaches are something else which really should be protested by boats.

There is no reason for a rc to act if they score the finish after the turns.