Translation missing: en.posts.shared.post_not_found

Powered by
WIND


Recent Posts

Recent Comments

  • Hands up, i really had a feeling this only applied if overlappzd. My mistake now acknowledged.
    The match racing call i referred to was b13, yes i have been checking it, different i think when passing to leeward with the windward boat advanced. 

    Here why is the leeward boat not giving room if the other boat is given room to keep clear? This is by passing astern of the obstruction. 

    Similarly, if blue gybes and the overlap is broken, why should she be burdened when the other boat can keep clear by luffing astern. 

    This goes against all my previous understanding, butmay actually comply with what the rule says. 
    Today 13:40
  • I think the approach I've seen used is to tell them they have been finished on the previous lap. (Legally or illegally)

    I still think if we see the SIs it will clarify the situation with a phrase like 'The Race Officer may decide to finish boats at any time at his discretion. This may not be the lead boat, but results will be calculated on average lap time to ensure fairness, the aim being to keep the finishing window as short  as practicable' (I selected that frome Penzance Sailing Club who used it for handicap and non-handicap fleets) or from my club 'For a committee boat finish, flag S will be displayed on the committee boat accompanied by two sound signals. For a shore-based finish, two sound signals will be made. Boats will finish the race when they next pass through the start / finish line. Finishing position shall be determined on an average lap basis.'

    (Clearly purists will say start/finish line shouldn't be mentioned - but for an average club sailor that's clear and easier to understand than describing a gate. And for the even more purist, a Committee Boat should be called a signal vessel but I can say with certainty the club sailors know what a committee boat is and will think I've lost the plot if I say signal vessel.)
    Yesterday 14:40
  • I think I can quickly prove to you that we reference points of sail based on true wind. Two pronged argument:
    1) Wikipedia repeatedly references "true wind" in their entry on Point of Sail: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Point_of_sail#No-go_zone
    2) when foiling boats are going downwind and their apparent wind angle is a near reach, we do not describe them as near-reaching, nor as being on a beat to windward. If they briefly point directly downwind, and their sails luff from the bow due to the apparent wind, we would never suggest they were head-to-wind. 
    Thu 13:58
  • It is simpler and more direct to add to radio sailing NOR or SI:
    "A protesting boat shall inform the other boat at the first opportunity. This adds to E6.3."

    Wed 18:20
  • There's nothing very unique about solo races in that respect. Take for example the Solong/Stena incident where an anchored tanker was hit in reasonable visibility  by another ship under autopilot. The captain is temporarily hosted at one of his Majesty's facilities.
    https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67f3dd5c53505b2ca44eff1a/Solong-StenaImmaculate-InterimReport.pdf

    26-Mar-28 18:13

Forums Leader Board

This Month

1 Colin Mann 1.5K
2 David Keeling 1.2K
3 Niko Kotsatos 1.19K
4 Michael Butterfield 1K
5 Eric Rimkus 810
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more