Boats PW, PM and PL are close-hauled and overlapped on port tack. Boat S is close-hauled on starboard tack. PW is on a collision course with S. PM and PL do not need to change course to pass safely astern of S. PW bears away to pass astern of S without making contact, and PM bears away to give her just enough space to do so. PL holds her course and there is contact between PM and PL, without damage or injury. No boat takes a penalty. PM protests PL.
How do the rules apply to this incident and which boat or boats should be disqualified?
S was an obstruction to PW, PM and PL because each of them would need to change course substantially if she were sailing directly towards S and were one hull length from S, and because they all were required by rule 10
to keep clear of S (see definition Obstruction
). PL had the right under rule 19.2
(a) to choose to pass S on either side because she had right of way over both PM and PW. However, PL was not entitled to hail for room to tack under rule 20
because she did not need to change course to avoid S (see rule 20.1
(a)). As PL passed astern of S, rule 19.2
(b) required PL to give room to both PM and PW to pass between her and S. Rule 19.2
(b) also required PM to give PW room.
The space that PL was required to give to PM and PW included enough space for PM to give PW room and for PM to keep clear of PL, as well as space for PW to keep clear of both S and PM (see the definition Room). PL did not give that space. Therefore, she broke rule 19.2
(b), and should be disqualified. PL also broke rule 14
because the contact could have been avoided if PL given PM and PW enough space. However, because PL had right of way over PM and there was no damage or injury, PL is exonerated under rule 43.1
(c) for her breach of rule 14
PM broke rule 11
, but she is exonerated under rule 43.1
(b). PM did not break rule 14
because it was not possible for her to have avoided making contact either with PL or with PW.(See Case 11
for discussion of a similar situation.)
World Sailing 2013