When boat A crossed the finishing line from the course side, the race committee scored her DNF because it believed from its observations that she had not left one of the rounding marks on the required side and, therefore, had failed to sail the course correctly. A requested redress on the grounds that, even though she had finished properly, she was not given a finishing place. The protest committee did not give A redress, deciding that rule 62.1
(a) did not apply because A failed to sail the course correctly, and that her failure to do so was not due to an act or omission of the race committee but was entirely her own fault. A appealed.
A's appeal is upheld. The race committee acted improperly in scoring A DNF when she did finish according to the definition Finish. The race committee could have scored boat A as DNF only for failing to finish correctly (see rule A5
). Since A crossed the finishing line from the course side, and none of the three exceptions in the definition Finish applied, she should have been recorded as having finished.
A fundamental principle of protest committee procedure is that a hearing must be limited to the particular "incident" alleged in a protest (see rule 61.2
(b)) or to the particular incident alleged to be "an improper action or omission" in a request for redress under rule 62.1
(a). Although the incident that was the subject of A's request for redress was that she had been incorrectly scored DNF, the protest committee turned to a different incident when it considered whether or not she had failed to sail the course correctly and therefore broken rule 28.1
. Since that incident was not the incident alleged in the request for redress, the committee acted improperly.
If a race committee believes from its observations that a boat has not sailed the course correctly, it may protest the boat for that breach as permitted by rule 60.2
(a). In this case, the race committee did not protest A. Because A had not been protested for failing to sail the course correctly, she could not be penalized for that failure.
In summary, the facts show that A finished according to the definition Finish
. She should not have been scored DNF and was therefore entitled to redress under rule 62.1
(a) for an improper action of the race committee. The decision of the protest committee is reversed and A is to be scored as having finished at the time she crossed the finishing line.