Skip to main content

The Racing Rules of Sailing

Tacking in the zone after rounding a leeward mark

Subscribe
P
Anthony Pelletier
Nationality: United States
Certifications:
  • Club Judge
  • Club Race Officer
image.png
image.png 141 KB

Several incidents and questions have come up regarding the obligations of a boat that tacks immediately after rounding a leeward mark to port. I think most of it is clear, and I think I have resolved the last question for myself. But I am interested in the opinions of others.

Scenario: Two boats on Port gybe approach a leeward mark to be rounded to port. Yellow enters the zone several boat lengths ahead of Blue and will be rounding and tacking to starboard while Blue is  entering the zone heading to round such that they are on collision course at position 5.
Some easy parts: 18 does not apply (18.1a3). While tacking, rule 13 applies to Yellow and she must keep clear until born off to close hauled.
My question involves rule 15 and my uncertainty derives from USA Sailing appeal US52. That case found that a boat initially to leeward, gybing to starboard is right of way throughout and therefore rule 15 does not apply. However, there is no rule equivalent to rule 13 that applies while gybing. My interpretation is that a boat tacking from leeward to starboard is subject to rule 15 because she is the keep clear boat while rule 13 applies. Her position as starboard is a newly acquired right of way.
Through the course of the event I am considering, Yellow goes from clear ahead (Positions 1-3), to leeward (Position 4), to starboard (Position 5). But Yellow is the keep clear boat during the tack. So I conclude that she is subject to rule 15 as she completes the tack. 
She must initially give Blue room to keep clear (whatever "initially" means in the extant conditions).

Any opposing views?

Created: Tue 17:43

Comments

Format:
Eric Rimkus
Nationality: United States
Certifications:
  • National Race Officer
  • National Judge
I don’t see that yellow clear ahead, yellow leeward, yellow starboard ever ceases to be the RoW boat to blue. 
So RRS 15, “when a boat acquires right of way…” doesn’t apply. 
RRS 13 uses “keep clear,” so I don’t see how yellow “looses” her status as RoW boat while taking because she instantly goes from leeward and luffing to starboard and bearing off. RRS 13 is just an obligation to do something (between HtW and CH), but it doesn’t transfer the RoW to the other boat. 
Through this entire evolution the only rule that I see at play for Yellow is RRS 16.1 and, briefly, RRS 13. 
Created: Tue 19:05
Sue Reilly
Certifications:
  • National Umpire
  • Regional Judge
  • Regional Race Officer
How about the part that says:
A boat has right of way over another boat when the other boat is required to keep clear of her.  
Created: Tue 20:35
P
Angelo Guarino
Forum Moderator
Nationality: United States
Certifications:
  • Regional Judge
Eric re: "I don’t see that yellow clear ahead, yellow leeward, yellow starboard ever ceases to be the RoW boat to blue. ... RRS 13 [..] doesn’t transfer the RoW to the other boat. "

That is incorrect.

The preamble of Part 2 Section A states ..
"A boat has right of way over another boat when the other boat is required to keep clear of her."

RRS 13 states .. 
"After a boat passes head to wind, she shall keep clear of other boats until she is on a close-hauled course. During that time rules 10, 11 and 12 do not apply. [..]"

Therefore 13 absolutely transfers ROW to ALL other boats that are not likewise simultaneously tacking.  The "tacking" boat must keep clear of all of them .. therefore they all have ROW over her. 
Created: Tue 20:41
P
Anthony Pelletier
Nationality: United States
Certifications:
  • Club Judge
  • Club Race Officer
I understand your point. ROW is actually an obsolete term no longer used in the IRPCAS ( formerly COLREGS).  But it is still used in the RRS and while there is no definition of ROW given in the "Definitions" section, Section A of part B defines ROW. 
"Section ARIGHT OF WAY
A boat has right of way over another boat when the other boat is required to keep clear of her. "
So, I read rule 13: "After a boat passes head to wind, she shall keep clear of other boats until she is on a close-hauled course. During that time rules 10, 11 and 12 do not apply. .." as stating the other boats who are not tacking (including Blue in my example) all have right of way over her. 
Created: Wed 00:33
Jim Champ
Nationality: United Kingdom
Anthony, I fear I disagree with calling ROW an obsolete term. There is a fundamental difference between Stand On in IRCPAS and ROW in RRS, and its very much a good thing that different terms are used. A Right of Way boat under RRS can change course and speed as much as she likes, subject to the various restrictions, but a Stand On boat may not.  No luffing under IRCPAS for instance. 
Created: Wed 08:31
Brent Draney
Certifications:
  • Judge In Training
Rule 13 is in Part A, Right of Way.  Not part B, Obligations.  I agree with Anthony’s assessment with the addition that 16.1 for any course changes.
Created: Tue 19:23
P
John Allan
Nationality: Australia
Certifications:
  • National Race Officer
  • National Judge
Anthony, I think your analysis is spot on.
Created: Tue 22:11
Rene Nusse
Nationality: Australia
Certifications:
  • Club Race Officer
  • Club Judge
  • Umpire In Training
I agree with your analysis:

  •  Rule 18 does not apply because of Rule 18.1(a). 
  •  Yellow is subject to Rule 13 during the tack. 
  •  Yellow loses right of way during the tack. 
  •  Yellow acquires a new right of way under Rule 10 when she reaches close-hauled. 
  •  Rule 15 therefore applies. 
  •  Yellow must initially give Blue room to keep clear. 

The decisive difference from Appeal 52 is that a gybing boat never loses right of way, whereas a tacking boat always does.

Created: Wed 00:00
Sue Reilly
Certifications:
  • National Umpire
  • Regional Judge
  • Regional Race Officer
Reply to: 22115 - Rene Nusse
Gybing boat never looses ROW, .......unless match racing :)
Created: Wed 00:06
Capt Tribhuwan Jaiswal
Nationality: India
Certifications:
  • International Judge
  • National Race Officer
Reply to: 22115 - Rene Nusse
I totally agree with your analysis. I missed reading your comments before putting in mine.
Created: Wed 02:30
P
John Allan
Nationality: Australia
Certifications:
  • National Race Officer
  • National Judge
Anthony ...  "right of way" was changed to "stand on" versus "stand down." [in COLREGS]

I don't think 'right of way' or 'stand down' were ever used in the COLREGS/IRPCAS.

By all means show me a version where they were.
Created: Wed 00:38
P
Anthony Pelletier
Nationality: United States
Certifications:
  • Club Judge
  • Club Race Officer
Reply to: 22118 - John Allan
A quick check suggests you are right. It's just one of those terms that "everyone" learned at some point but was never in the COLREGS/IRPCAS. 
Created: Wed 00:42
P
Anthony Pelletier
Nationality: United States
Certifications:
  • Club Judge
  • Club Race Officer
Oh, Sue. Yes, Match racing rule 13 includes gybing ("Gybing, boom, DONE").
Created: Wed 00:38
P
John Quirk
Nationality: New Zealand
Certifications:
  • National Judge
  • Judge In Training
Thanks everyone - fully clear to me now too.
Created: Wed 01:34
Capt Tribhuwan Jaiswal
Nationality: India
Certifications:
  • International Judge
  • National Race Officer
Going by the discussions above Yellow was right of way boat until she tacks.
Whilst tacking yellow is keep clear boat hence Blue acquires right of way.
As soon as Yellow is close hauled on starboard, Yellow on port tack becomes keep clear boat. At this moment Yellow acquires right of way.  
Now in my opinion rule 15 does come into play because here Yellow is acquiring right of way therefore it is obliged to initially give blue room to keep clear.
Created: Wed 02:29
P
Kim Kymlicka
Nationality: United States
Certifications:
  • National Judge
  • National Umpire
Tony,

The situation you presented is something we see a lot in the ILCA, Opti and few other classes.
In my opinion, the move by Yellow is not very well thought out. 

First, in the absence of very adverse current of major wind shift, and even then, why would a boat want to sail through a fleet of oncoming boats, blocking the air. 
Second, Yellow is putting herself in position that she may get DSQ, if proper protest is filed.

Let me explain: In your scenario, under R 13, Yellow gives away her ROW to Blue and has to keep clear of Blue. Blue, as the ROW, can sail her course with no need to take avoiding action and…
When Yellow achieves her close-haul course, she re-gains her ROW and R 15 turns ON.

Since R 15 is in the Section B (General Limitations) it injects a time factor (initially) to when Yellow can claim her full ROW on Blue and by embedding two Definitions; Room and Keep Clear.

Room: The space a boat needs in the existing conditions, including space to comply with her obligations under the rules of Part 2 and rule 31, while manoeuvring promptly in a seamanlike way.

Blue now has to be manoeuvring promptly in a seamanlike way. When she cannot do so in a seamanlike way, she has not been given room as required by rule 15. (Case 24).
In your scenario, I will argue that Blue has absolutely no way out to avoid a collision with Yellow while manoeuvring promptly in a seamanlike way.

If Blue luffs up, she is even closer to the path of Yellow. If Blue turns down to jibe, Blue will expose her Port side to Yellow’s bow. In fleet racing , hard luff and crash jibe are not considered seamanlike way maneuvers.

At this point the Blue will ‘Protest’ Yellow under R 15. 
Yellow’s best action is to tack back to Port as soon as she is aware of Blue’s location. That may keep Yellow out protest room and avoid a collision.

So, as I said initially, not a smart move on the part of Yellow. Double tacking (down speed) in traffic and very little air does not win any races.

As a bonus, and we see that a lot too, add other boats to either side of Blue. Blue has no place to go while manoeuvring promptly in a seamanlike way.
Kim

 

Created: Thu 06:40
P
John Allan
Nationality: Australia
Certifications:
  • National Race Officer
  • National Judge
Reply to: 22132 - Kim Kymlicka
I will argue that Blue has absolutely no way out to avoid a collision with Yellow while manoeuvring promptly in a seamanlike way. If Blue luffs up, she is even closer to the path of Yellow. If Blue turns down to jibe, Blue will expose her Port side...
Hi Kym,

We're judges not tactics coaches.

 I will argue that Blue has absolutely no way out to avoid a collision with Yellow while manoeuvring promptly in a seamanlike way.

Maybe, but that's what RRS 15 is there for.  Y is required to give B room to keep clear.

In fleet racing , hard luff and crash jibe are not considered seamanlike way maneuvers.

You're kidding me?

How is a hard luff not an ordinary seamanlike manoeuvre.

'Crash gybe', OK Case 99

But, leaving aside fragile rigs and very heavy conditions, I've never been able to work out the difference between a fast gybe when a boat wants to gybe quickly, and a 'crash gybe', particularly in a una rig like a Laser.
Created: Thu 12:36
P
Anthony Pelletier
Nationality: United States
Certifications:
  • Club Judge
  • Club Race Officer
Hi Kim. Always good to hear from you. I have some fun stories from the Naples Sabot Jr. Nat's to share with you next time we talk, or perhaps over email. 
I also thought about it tactically, since I coach high-school kids. But, as John said, that wasn't the question for this forum. We agree across the board on the answer to the rules issue. 
The question came up in out Sunfish fleet. Also, I was involved in one where I was driving a friend's Harbor 20 around the leeward mark during our Thursday Night Thing.  A Melges 15 tacked after rounding right in front of me. The owner of the Harbor was more animated in his response than I was.
In my discussion with the M15 sailor afterward (he is an aspiring judge), I covered the rules issues we discussed here and added that it's often not a smart decision if boats are approaching. 
I think I sit somewhere between you and John on what would constitute "unseamanlike" and it depends on the boats and conditions, of course. If Blue could avoid Yellow with a quick luff, turndown and back up around the mark, I think that would still fall under seamanlike (as drawn, I don't think that would be an option). But if Blue luffed up hard, had to gybe to get to the mark, then gybe again to round all that close to the mark, I don't think that Y gave him room to comply with rule 31 in a seamanlike manner. Adding all the boats you put in definitely makes it impossible for Blue to comply with part 2 rules in a seamanlike way.

As an aside, if you are using "SailReplay" there is an option to change the number of a boat in its start position. Your drawing is clear given the context of our discussion. But it confuses the times of each position
Look forward to working with you again soon.
Tony
Created: Thu 14:40
P
John Allan
Nationality: Australia
Certifications:
  • National Race Officer
  • National Judge
Reply to: 22132 - Kim Kymlicka
if Blue luffed up hard, had to gybe to get to the mark, then gybe again to round all that close to the mark, I don't think that Y gave him room to comply with rule 31 in a seamanlike manner
Tony, I'm not buying that.

B keeps clear and two gybes later she hits the mark.

That was a result of B rushing her gybes and misjudging her approach to the mark.

But as a tactical assessment I wouldn't expect B to even try to luff in front of Y.

As diagrammed, it's all on Y.  I think the only option for Y is to change course to starboard and let B through.
Created: Thu 20:38
P
Angelo Guarino
Forum Moderator
Nationality: United States
Certifications:
  • Regional Judge
Kim .. I'm with you (and made the same point in a previous thread) .. in that this is a risky maneuver for Yellow especially in fleet racing.  Being risky means that Yellow should spend an extra second or 2 to make sure that she sees her clear path and/or ability for others to react safely.  The more boats .. the harder the math.  

I actually did this maneuver 2 Wed's ago in a fleet of 26 J/105's .. 14g18kts.  It was a downwind start out-n-back course from Annapolis Harbor.  I got stuck on the outside and behind at the leeward rounding and had to tack away asap .. I had a nice gap and tacked to starboard (forcing a competitor to likewise tack).   That said, had there been boats closer coming under spin I would have waited as port-boats under spin might be sent to the wrong side of the mark and broadsides with others. 

Highly situational and IMO deserves an extra bit of caution and calculation by Yellow. 
Created: Fri 12:06
P
Angelo Guarino
Forum Moderator
Nationality: United States
Certifications:
  • Regional Judge
Kim .. I'm with you (and made the same point in a previous thread) .. in that this is a risky maneuver for Yellow especially in fleet racing.  Being risky means that Yellow should spend an extra second or 2 to make sure that she sees her clear path and/or ability for others to react.  

I actually did this maneuver 2 Wed's ago on a fleet of 26 J/105's .. 15g20kts.  It was a downwind start out-n-back course from Annapolis Harbor.  I got stuck on the outside and behind at the leeward rounding and had to tack away asap .. I had a nice gap and tacked to starboard (forcing a competitor to likewise tack).   That said, had there been boats closer coming under spin I would have waited as port-boats under spin might be sent to the wrong side of the mark and broadsides with others. 

Highly situational and IMO deserves an extra bit of caution and calculation by Yellow. 

PS: At the same time .. there was a T-bone at that mark between 2 105's .. both sustained sig-damage and are out for repairs. 
Created: Fri 12:06
P
Anthony Pelletier
Nationality: United States
Certifications:
  • Club Judge
  • Club Race Officer
John. 
We may just disagree on that. And it does depend on conditions and the boats. 
B is not obliged to start avoiding until Y’s tack is complete (though it might be smart to react sooner and hail protest). 
In support of your view, Y does not have to give B room to pass on the correct side of the mark, only room to avoid hitting it. If a hard luff avoided Y, but left B aiming at the wrong side of the mark, Y could argue convincingly that she gave B room. 
Created: Thu 21:31
P
John Allan
Nationality: Australia
Certifications:
  • National Race Officer
  • National Judge
Tony, Exactly:  as diagrammed there's a whole ocean of room for B to avoid hitting the mark.
Created: Thu 21:35
P
Beau Vrolyk
Forum Moderator
Nationality: United States
Kim,

In the original post, there are exactly two boats displayed. If we stick to that situation, Blue has heaps of room to avoid, as does Yellow after she tacks. But only for a specific class of boat with known maneuverability characteristics.

As to a "seamanlike manner", one has to specify the boats to even start to discuss this. For many years I raced small and nimble boats that could turn 90° in a boat-length and easily sail dead downwind in a very seamanlike manner. In the original, sailing dead downwind would easily allow Blue to keep clear.  I also spent a decade aggressively racing a 60' schooner that required 120' and many seconds (even minutes in light air) to turn 90°.  In the Original post, if we're discussing my 60' schooner, as Yellow and a similar boat as Blue, then a prudent skipper aboard Yellow would tack far later than is shown in the original post or would be forced by Rule 15 to slow their tack so that Blue could pass.

In the fleet racing situation you've added to the thread, it could be unwise for Yellow to tack into the wall of approaching Port tack boats along with Blue, but Yellow would NOT be breaking a rule in doing that. Indeed, this is a regular maneuver in team-racing for the leader to get onto starboard after the leeward mark rounding and force the competition away from the mark. Thus, it could be a tactical error but once Yellow has established herself on starboard, the responsibility shifts to all the port tack boats. (Again, this would all depend on the maneuverability of the type of boat in question.)

Do note that the question of a "seaman like" doesn't come into play when there is clearly time for Port tack boats to avoid, even if that requires that they head up aggressively, gybe, or even stop. Claims of poor tactics and strategy do not alter the racing rules.

A final comments, NOT related to the original question. You've stated that "In fleet racing , hard luff and crash jibe are not considered seamanlike way maneuvers." First, I'd like to point out that there is no place in the rules that I can find that appears to support this sentence. Both "hard luff" and "crash jibe" could be "seamanlike" or not depending up the boat, the crew, and the conditions. Going back to the dinghy vs the 60' schooner example, it's obvious that knowledge of the boats involved is crucial. You did describe your thoughts were for ILCA and Opti classes. In your diagram, what is a much more likely scenario is that Red and Blue could end up in a pin-wheel around the mark, Green can easily head up and pass to windward of Yellow. Turquoise and Gray have plenty of time to realize that there is a starboard tack boat coming and to take seaman like action to avoid fouling Yellow. I agree that it might be stupid for Yellow to tack into the face of a herd of port tack boats, but Yellow doesn't seem to be breaking any rule.

Created: Fri 22:38
You must be signed in to add a comment.
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more